MIC conviction :: Essays Papers

MIC convictionIntroduction tercet aviation students with similar cases involving Minor in Consumption charges will be discussed. The three students are Mr. Jack Daniels, Mr. Johnnie Walker, and Ms. Brandy Wine. We will look at for each one student separately and answer questions pertaining to each of their situations. Some of the questions include whether or not the students need to acquiesce with the reporting requirement of 14 CFR 61.15. What, if any, reports do they have to make on their next medical? We will withal discuss Ms. Wines situation, whether or not the police cylinder block violated the Fourth Amendment.Mr. Jack DanielsMr. Daniels was cited for Minor in Consumption of Alcohol, pled guilty, and was sentenced to even out a $100 fine. Mr. Daniels wants to know what he needs to do to comply with the FAA so that he can remain a pilot. According to 14 CFR 61.15(e), Each person holding a certificate issued under this fictional character shall provide a written re port of each repulse fomite action to the FAA . . . no later than 60 days after the ride fomite action. To determine whether Mr. Daniels must comply with this regulation, a labor fomite action must be defined. As per 14 CFR 61.15(c), a motor vehicle action means(1) A conviction after November 29, 1990, for the misdemeanor of any Federal or State statute relating to the transaction of a motor vehicle while intoxicated by inebriant or a drug, while impaired by alcoholic drink or a drug, or while under the influence of alcohol or a drug(2) The cancellation, suspension, or revocation of a indorse to operate a motor vehicle after November 29, 1990, for a cause related to the operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated by alcohol or a drug, while impaired by alcohol or a drug, or while under the influence of alcohol or a drug(3) The denial after November 29, 1990, of an application for a license to operate a motor vehicle for a cause related to the operation of a motor vehic le while intoxicated b alcohol or a drug, while impaired by alcohol or a drug, or while under the influence of alcohol or a drug.Mr. Daniels was not involved with a motor vehicle therefore, he does not fall under any of these definitions of a motor vehicle action. This means that Mr. Daniels will not have to report to the FAA.