Critical Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory of Stereotyping

Stereotyping is a form of pre appraisal that is as prevalent in todays parliamentary law as it was 2000 years ago. It is a tender attitude that has stood the testify of time and received some(prenominal) attention by friendly psychologists and philosophers alike. Many approaches to, or theories of stereotyping energise thus been raised. This quiz evaluates the cognitive approach that categorisation is an inborn cognitive procedure that needfully leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) calls this a depressing dilemma.\n\nBrowns (1995) definition of stereotyping through with(predicate) prejudice is the holding of derogatory social attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the expression of negative affect, or the debunk of hostile or homophobic behaviour towards members of a root on account of their social status to that mathematical group. This definition implies that stereotyping is primarily a group process, through the individuals psyches inwardly that group. A further ro ot word of stereotyping, defined by Allport (1954) as thinking ill of opposites without warrant, is that people make their thinker up without any personal experience. This pre judgement about a solid group is then transferred to the stigmatization of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of categorisation and the above definitions that vex about three distinguishable gass of stereotyping, that our cognition can be demonstrated through.\n\nThe first peculiar(prenominal) of stereotyping is over-generalisation. A number of studies conducted open up that different combinations of traits were associated with groups of different heathen and national origin (Katz and Braly, 1933). However, stereotyping does non imply that all members of a group are judged in these ways, just that a regular(prenominal) member of a group can be categorized in such judgements, that they own the characteristics of the group. Still, when we talk of a group, we do so by imagining a member of that group.\n\nThe second feature and characteristic of stereotyping is the exaggeration of the struggle between ones own group (the in-group) and the different group (the out-group). This can be traced back to the work of Tajfel during the 1950s - the accentuation principle (Tajfel, 1981). Tajfels work was specifically on physical stimuli, and concluded that judgements on such stimuli are not made in isolation, solely in the context of other factors. Applied socially - a judgement about an out-group relies upon other factors surrounding the judgement in question, as...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.